Best Alternatives to AITraining.jobs in 2025
AITraining.jobs is an aggregator for people who want to get paid to train, evaluate and label data for AI. It pulls open roles daily from 25 platforms, shows advertised hourly pay, and covers RLHF, red-teaming, data annotation and more. But aggregation isn't for everyone: some people want to work directly on a single platform, prefer a marketplace with broader contract work, or need a tool built around a specific type of task. Here are the best alternatives to AITraining.jobs, depending on what you're optimizing for.
Mercor
The highest-volume platform for AI training and expert data work, with roles spanning coding, law, medicine and generalist annotation. If you want to apply directly to one well-funded marketplace with strong pay bands and a steady stream of projects, Mercor is the most obvious destination. It's also one of the platforms AITraining.jobs indexes, so you can use the aggregator to spot a role and then apply on Mercor itself.
Outlier (by Scale AI)
A large, established platform for RLHF, red-teaming and model evaluation work, with flexible hours and a wide range of task types. Outlier is a good alternative if you'd rather commit to a single platform with a mature review and payment pipeline than browse an aggregator. It's especially strong for people who want ongoing project work rather than one-off gigs.
micro1
A platform focused on sourcing and vetting AI trainers, with an emphasis on technical and domain-expert roles. If you have a specialized background (software engineering, math, medicine) and want a platform that matches you to higher-paying expert projects, micro1 is a strong direct alternative. It also runs its own vetting process, which can lead to more consistent work once you're in.
DataAnnotation
A well-known platform for text, code and chatbot-quality annotation work, with a straightforward application and per-hour pay. It's a good alternative for people who want a simpler, more self-serve entry point into AI training work without navigating a large aggregator. The trade-off is less visibility into pay ranges and role variety than AITraining.jobs offers.
Alignerr
A platform built around expert-level AI training and evaluation, with an emphasis on reasoning, coding and domain knowledge. It's a solid alternative if you want to work on higher-difficulty tasks and are willing to go through a more selective onboarding process. Alignerr tends to attract people who want to be paid for depth of expertise rather than volume of simple labeling.
Braintrust
A talent marketplace that includes AI training and data work alongside broader contract and freelance roles. If you want one profile that can surface AI training gigs plus other technical or creative contract work, Braintrust is a more general alternative to a dedicated AI-jobs aggregator. It's useful for people who don't want to be locked into a single category of work.
Prolific
A research-participation platform that pays for studies, surveys and some AI-related evaluation tasks. It's a different model from AITraining.jobs, but it's a legitimate alternative for people who want flexible, short-session paid work rather than long-term AI training projects. Pay per task is usually lower, but the barrier to entry is minimal and the work is varied.
AITraining.jobs wins on breadth: it aggregates roughly 3,400 open roles from 25 platforms and shows advertised pay, which makes it the fastest way to compare opportunities across the AI-training economy. The best alternative depends on your goal. If you want to commit to one high-volume marketplace, Mercor or Outlier are the strongest direct choices. If you have specialized expertise, micro1 or Alignerr will likely match you to better-paying work. If you want a simpler entry point, DataAnnotation is easy to start with, while Braintrust and Prolific suit people who want AI work mixed with broader contract or research gigs. Use AITraining.jobs to discover and compare, then apply directly on the platform that fits your profile.